Would energized work be more commonly allowed if decision-makers understood the related laws and consequences?

Understanding the related laws and consequences surrounding energized work can significantly influence decision-makers' approaches to allowing such work. If decision-makers are well-informed about safety regulations, potential hazards, and legal implications, they are likely to make more judicious choices regarding work that poses risks.

Comprehensive knowledge can lead to a greater emphasis on safety protocols and risk assessment, potentially favoring more stringent measures rather than permitting energized work without adequate precautions. A clear understanding enables decision-makers to recognize the importance of risk management and the benefits of implementing safety standards, and can foster a culture that prioritizes worker safety.

As a result, when decision-makers are informed, they may be more inclined to establish control measures that allow energized work under specific, safe conditions, reinforcing the notion that knowledge leads to better safety practices. This creates an environment where energized work might be permitted with appropriate safeguards, rather than being broadly restricted or misunderstood.